In a landmark study out today, Baum et al. finds that the public in the Global South are more supportive of Solar Radiation Management (SRM) research and the prospect of deployment.
This Nature article represents an enormous effort to contrast public opinion in the global North vs. South about issues that I have a feeling most people have very little understanding of. I know it has been difficult for me to grasp even the basics of climate issues, and I am a retired person with a background in statistics.
After wading through a whole lot of fear porn and hysteria, I've finally gotten to a source that makes sense and is backed by historical documents, patents, and published research. So, members of the global North and global South, who are scratching your heads and saying to yourselves "what is SRM anyway!? " I refer you to Jim Lee at climateviewer.com and climateviewer.org, and to his substack https://climateviewer.substack.com/p/israels-stealth-geoengineering-project
Cheers for the write-up, Pete. Good thoughts on the policy questions and alternative formulations - something to think about for the future. As far as the one item being "leading" - sure, I can accept that to a degree. We wanted to ensure that people did not (incorrectly) think that technologies would be banned willy-nilly. As you say, the fact that the option was so poorly selected despite that, proves quite interesting.
I support SAI via enhanced methane oxidization , We need a fleet of hi flying aircraft to infuse the stratosphere approx 21 km high at the equator and 15/30/45 degrees nth and south roughly 50 thousand tn per year for 10 years with Iron chloride to transform methane to co2 and then the co2 can be consumed via phytoplankton using ocean iron fertilization , this is the only thing that will retify climate change in a timely manner and stop the polar melts and the stalling of admoc , bring it on urgently , research research research
This Nature article represents an enormous effort to contrast public opinion in the global North vs. South about issues that I have a feeling most people have very little understanding of. I know it has been difficult for me to grasp even the basics of climate issues, and I am a retired person with a background in statistics.
After wading through a whole lot of fear porn and hysteria, I've finally gotten to a source that makes sense and is backed by historical documents, patents, and published research. So, members of the global North and global South, who are scratching your heads and saying to yourselves "what is SRM anyway!? " I refer you to Jim Lee at climateviewer.com and climateviewer.org, and to his substack https://climateviewer.substack.com/p/israels-stealth-geoengineering-project
https://climateviewer.com/geoengineering/
https://climateviewer.com/stratospheric-sulfur-geoengineering-benefits-and-risks/
Cheers for the write-up, Pete. Good thoughts on the policy questions and alternative formulations - something to think about for the future. As far as the one item being "leading" - sure, I can accept that to a degree. We wanted to ensure that people did not (incorrectly) think that technologies would be banned willy-nilly. As you say, the fact that the option was so poorly selected despite that, proves quite interesting.
I support SAI via enhanced methane oxidization , We need a fleet of hi flying aircraft to infuse the stratosphere approx 21 km high at the equator and 15/30/45 degrees nth and south roughly 50 thousand tn per year for 10 years with Iron chloride to transform methane to co2 and then the co2 can be consumed via phytoplankton using ocean iron fertilization , this is the only thing that will retify climate change in a timely manner and stop the polar melts and the stalling of admoc , bring it on urgently , research research research