Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert Tulip's avatar

Thank you Pete. I prefer the concept of Brightening the Earth rather than your phrase dimming the Sun. The point is to increase planetary albedo for sunlight reflection, recognising albedo is now falling by more that 1% per decade according to NASA. We have to reverse this planetary darkening and its dangerous acceleration of GHG heating. Brightening the Earth presents this in a positive way.

Jim Hansen argues in Global Warming in the Pipeline that Marine Cloud Brightening is the most innocuous way to start cooling the planet, partly because it is local, whereas stratospheric aerosol injection is necessarily global at latitude. His call for intervention with Earth’s radiation imbalance has potential to shift the debate.

A main reason MCB is more innocuous is that political agreement for MCB could be obtained within affected jurisdictions. That would show people the benefit of the concept of cooling, enabling a more receptive discussion of SAI. I would like to see Australia extend our testing of MCB on the Great Barrier Reef to the southern Indian Ocean. That would be optimal for reversing the local loss and damage from warming and would not affect any other countries.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts